deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

More from ~didjerama in News

Featured in Groups:

Details

March 14, 2008
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 19
Favourites: 28 [who?]

Views: 170 (0 today)
[x]
After hearing many stories about people having problems being able to take photos on the street (in the uk), I'd thought i'd show you this too look at.

"PHOTOGRAPHY IN PUBLIC AREAS
11.03.2008

Mitchell, Austin

That this House is concerned to encourage the spread and enjoyment of photography as the most genuine and accessible people's art; deplores the apparent increase in the number of reported incidents in which the police community support officers (PCSOs) or wardens attempt to stop street photography and order the deletion of photographs or the confiscation of cards, cameras or film on various specious ground such as claims that some public buildings are strategic or sensitive, that children and adults can only be photographed with their written permission, that photographs of police and PCSOs are illegal, or that photographs may be used by terrorists; points out that photography in public places and streets is not only enjoyable but perfectly legal; regrets all such efforts to stop, discourage or inhibit amateur photographers taking pictures in public places, many of which are in any case festooned with closed circuit television cameras; and urges the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers to agree on a photography code for the information of officers on the ground, setting out the public's right to photograph public places thus allowing photographers to enjoy their hobby without officious interference or unjustified suspicion."

Only a few MP's have signed it so far, but its something to keep an eye on. If we all email our own MP's we might be able to put an end to this insane ideal about photography in public places.

Visit [link] to find your local MP
Link to the montion : [link]
Add a Comment:
 
:iconbriefrespite:
my MP has already signed.

it makes me SO angry when i get weird looks for taking photos in public. CCTV is dangerous and noone cares. The ID State is dangerous and noone cares. But a young woman taking photographs?!! - wow i must be dangerous.
Reply
:iconin-art-we-trust:
I received a letter from my MP thanking me for bringing this matter to his attention and he indicated me he has signed the Early Day Motion and will support the intent in the House.

I also received a print out of the motion which shows there are currently 62 signatures on it.
Reply
:iconrushy:
I wrote to my MP!
Reply
:iconequivoque:
thanks for posting this.
Reply
:iconscott2206:
~Scott2206 Mar 15, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
Hmmmm the film equilibrium springs to mind. I'd understand the police asking a few questions if photographing a government building - it's their job to ensure the safety of the public maybe take your name and run it through PNC for tags but if they find nothing or dont think you are a terrorist/threat they should just leave you to get on with it. Why are there loads of people outside of Buckingham Palac every day taking photo's? surely they should be stopped!!! I'd definately understand if you were sat in a bush near a kiddies play ground but I dont think a terrorist of peado would be so bold or fussy about their photo's that they would take out a tripod, take a light reading set the shutter speed and aperture and then get in a fit because they forgot to shoot on RAW.

This makes me wanna go and purposly shoot in the street to provoke a police response. In fact I work for the youth offending team so I might give all my kids on court orders cameras and send them out and when they get stopped and asked for their cameras tell them to tell the police "fine i'll just go back to drinking taking drugs stealing and kicking the shit out of people"!!!

Pisses me off!!!

*** end of rant*** :D
Reply
:iconswitchbladeserenade:
`switchbladeserenade Mar 22, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
"but I dont think a terrorist of peado would be so bold or fussy about their photo's that they would take out a tripod, take a light reading set the shutter speed and aperture and then get in a fit because they forgot to shoot on RAW."

I read this and laughed so hard I choked on my coffee. Brilliant! :lmao:
Reply
:iconorangedestroy:
~Orangedestroy Mar 15, 2008   Photographer
Only last week i had two police officers try and confiscate my camera for taking photos in the centre of Brighton, which i duely refused. They persisted so I then told them to arrest me and they looked rather puzzeled and told me to move along. Which i also refused to do as they cant tell me to get off the pavement.

Luckliy i had read into the laws of street photography in the UK. Maybe the Police should do the same thing.
Reply
:iconspyworkz:
*SPyWorkz Mar 15, 2008  Professional Digital Artist
This is not only a problem in the UK.. it's the same here in India.

I had faced similar concerns while photographing a government building, which had beautiful architecture.
It's a shame that terrorism is getting the best of art!
Reply
:iconlizakot:
~lizakot Mar 14, 2008   Photographer
People are crazy and need new brains. It isnt logical!
Reply
:iconiaiarose:
`IaiaRose Mar 14, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
I can understand their position, but they definitely don't have the right to do so. Especially asking for people to delete their work after the fact.
Reply
Add a Comment: